Legal Opinion

Bieg v. Shamel

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1954No. Civ. No. 20123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Action by real estate broker to recover commission allegedly due him from defendants. Judgment was for plaintiff in the sum of $15,429.37 ($13,500 plus interest). Defendants appeal from the judgment.

Defendants, husband and wife, owned certain real property in Los Angeles County known as the Shamel Ranch. On April 2, 1950, defendant Jennings B. Shamel signed, and de*701livered to plaintiff, a listing agreement which provided that plaintiff had the exclusive right until May 5, 1950, to sell the Shamel Ranch for $200,000; that Shamel would pay to plaintiff, as commission, 7% per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commeford v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. McGill v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Hodges v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. J. Gunderson v. Friden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API