Legal Opinion
Putnam County National Bank of Carmel v. Pryschlak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Joel Gutterman appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated January 23, 1995, as, upon granting his motion for a protective order staying the sale of certain property, conditioned the stay upon his making monthly payments of $2,000 towards the satisfaction of a deficiency judgment previously entered in this action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We reject the appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly conditioned the granting of a protective…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- V.R.W., Inc. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Finnegan v. HumesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Finnegan v. HumesNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Hammond v. Econo-Car of North Shore, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972
- AMEV Capital Corp. v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colonial Surety Co. v. Lakeview Advisors, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Stern v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Colonial Surety Co. v. Lakeview Advisors, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY v. LAKEVIEW ADVISORS, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011