Legal Opinion
State v. Kenne
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
The claim of the State is that, under the evidence, the district court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.
Ail the testimony introduced on behalf of the State comes from the witness Steussy. After testifying to the time and place, he says:
“I have known Otto Kenne for probably 25 or 30 years. I met "him at the Gazette livery barn in Whittemore. I bought liquor of him there. Asked him for the purchase of liquor, and he got a quart bottle out and filled it for me. He got the quart bottle out of an oat bin — a feed bin in Mr. Gazette’s barn. He filled a bottle for me. I have got that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AldermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- State v. SpeedlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BrustkernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Riceman v. Union Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Kammerer v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- State v. BrustkernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969