Legal Opinion

State v. Kenne

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The claim of the State is that, under the evidence, the district court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Ail the testimony introduced on behalf of the State comes from the witness Steussy. After testifying to the time and place, he says:

“I have known Otto Kenne for probably 25 or 30 years. I met "him at the Gazette livery barn in Whittemore. I bought liquor of him there. Asked him for the purchase of liquor, and he got a quart bottle out and filled it for me. He got the quart bottle out of an oat bin — a feed bin in Mr. Gazette’s barn. He filled a bottle for me. I have got that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AldermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. State v. SpeedlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrustkernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Riceman v. Union Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Kammerer v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. State v. BrustkernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API