Turner v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 54 — ACTION OF COVENANT — APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. Counsel argued chiefly upon the facts as they developed from the ■evidence in the record. Upon the questions of law, the citations were as follows: Rankins v. R. R. Co., 2 Mo., 167; Buford v. Pickett, 3 Mo. App., 105; •Seattle v. Gilchrist, 4 Wash. St. Rep., 509; Am. Digest for 1893, 1939; Inez v. Quinn, 22 N. Y. St., 261; 159 Pa. St.. 99; N. Y. Syndicate v. Frazier, 130 U. S., 611; Van Rensaleer y.
Read the full summary
Case 54 — ACTION OF COVENANT — APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. Counsel argued chiefly upon the facts as they developed from the ■evidence in the record. Upon the questions of law, the citations were as follows: Rankins v. R. R. Co., 2 Mo., 167; Buford v. Pickett, 3 Mo. App., 105; •Seattle v. Gilchrist, 4 Wash. St. Rep., 509; Am. Digest for 1893, 1939; Inez v. Quinn, 22 N. Y. St., 261; 159 Pa. St.. 99; N. Y. Syndicate v. Frazier, 130 U. S., 611; Van Rensaleer y. Moule, 16 N. Y. St., 465; Lou R. R. Co., v. Cox, 50 111. App., 380; Douglass y. Bates, 26 111. App., 369; Russell v. Hayden, 41…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HOBSON
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a second appeal of this case. The opinion, on the former appeal will be found in 18 Ky. Law Rep., 202; [31 S. W., 1028], and as the facts of the ease are fully stated there, they need not be repeated here. On the return of the case it was transferred to equity, and, the court having allowed appellants less than they were willing to accept, they have again brought the case to this court, appellee taking a cross appeal.
At the threshold we are met with a motion to disregard substantially all the proof in the case, on the ground that it is…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Moss v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
- Dowling's Adm'x v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905