Legal Opinion
Crowl v. Kayo Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 18, 2002No. 1002058Published
1Opinion of the Court
848 So.2d 930 (2002)
Robert CROWL
v.
KAYO OIL COMPANY.
1002058.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
October 18, 2002.
Michael E. Auffenorde of Auffenorde & Auffenorde, P.C., Huntsville, for appellant.
D. Edward Starnes III and Jeffrey T. Kelly of Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne, P.C., Huntsville, for appellee.
MADDOX, Retired Justice.
The dispositive issue on this appeal, involving a premises-liability question, is whether the plaintiff, whose complaint asserted claims against several fictitiously named defendants, as permitted by Rule 9(h), Ala. R. Civ. P., exercised "due diligence" to ascertain the name of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lyons; Concurrence · Lyons.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.