Legal Opinion

Mail-Well Envelope Co. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1989No. 88-AB-956; CA A49152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

In this unemployment compensation case, employer seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board order reversing the referee’s denial of benefits. The assignment of error attacks EAB’s conclusions in their entirety. Employer states that the question presented is whether EAB’s conclusion is supported by substantial evidence. Most of employer’s argument, in effect, asks that we undertake de novo review. We do not have that authority. ORS 183.482(8)(c); see Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). However, employer also contends that two of EAB’s specific findings are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Multnomah Plywood Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API