Legal Opinion
Brannigan v. Union Gold-Min. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
Decided March 11, 1899No. 3,827PublishedCited by 14 opinions
On Demurrer to Complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
HALLETT, District Judge (orally).
James Brannigan and Mary B. Brannigan against the Union Gold-Mining Company is an action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiffs’ son. Deceased was in the employ of the defendant company, and it is alleged that his death occurred from negligence of the company in respect to the management of the mine while he was in such employment. The action is based upon the statute of the state which gives the right to the father.and mother to recover damages in the case of a death occurring through the negligence of the defendant under circumstances shown in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Deni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- McConville v. HowellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1883
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & PowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- McMillan v. Spider Lake Saw Mill & Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Romano v. Capital City Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Pocahontas Colleries Co. v. Rukas' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.