Legal Opinion

Russell v. Holderness

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1927No. 6 Div. 819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The bill in this case is filed by the appellee against the appellants, and seeks a mandatory writ of injunction to abate a public nuisance consisting of a sawmill, lumber yard, lumber shed, and other buildings constructed by the defendants in what is alleged to be Commerce street in the town of Cordova.

On submission on the demurrers to the bill, motion for a temporary writ of injunction, and testimony taken ore tenus, the court overruled the demurrers, and granted a temporary mandatory writ of injunction compelling the immediate removal of the structures complained of.

The sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Jones v. BrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. First National Bank v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Keller v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Wood v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Hanna v. HarmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY v. FincherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API