Legal Opinion
Brock v. Brock
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
This is an application to vacate a garnishee execution. It is not disputed that the debtor, a resident of California, is employed by the R. K. 0. Radio Pictures, Inc., a Delaware corporation, licensed to do business in the States of New York and California. The debtor performs his services exclusively in California and he receives no remuneration in this State.
Counsel concede that the statutory rules of attachment apply to the garnishee proceedings under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.
Prior to 1936 it was well settled that a garnishment of salary due or to become due from a foreign…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Dos Passos v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- American Dry Ice Corp. v. Delancey Chemical Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Carpenter v. FarabaughCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- American Dry Ice Corp. v. Delancey Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salm v. Krieg, New York County Courts1944
- Vintage Society Wholesalers Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Christmas v. BuckleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942