Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Herlands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order striking out certain complete separate defenses in an action for libel, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Jacobs v. Herlands, 257 App. Div. 1050; Bingham v. Gaynor, 203 N. Y. 27; Moore v. M. N. Bank, 123 id. 420; Nunnally v. Press Publishing Co., 110 App. Div. 10.) The appellant may serve a third amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bingham v. . GaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Nunnally v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Jacobs v. HerlandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sciandra v. LynettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Lombardo v. StokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. In re the Arbitration between Board of Education & Buffalo Council of Supervisors & AdministratorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Mink Hollow Development Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Bridgwood v. Newspaper PM Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API