Legal Opinion
Household Finance Corp. v. Bridge
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 5, 1969No. [No. 95, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
In Carr v. Watkins, 227 Md. 578, 177 A. 2d 841 (1962), Judge Hammond (now Chief Judge) expressing the opinion of this Court stated, that Maryland would recognize in a “proper case” the right of a person to redress for an unwarranted invasion of his privacy.
We now have before us an appeal from a judgment on the verdict of a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County awarding the appellee the sum of $3,000.00, against the appellant for the latter’s invasion of her privacy.
The question is: is this a “proper case” ?
On November 1, 1966, Mrs. Gloria May Bridge (appellee) and her father,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carr v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. ZerbstSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Patton v. JacobsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Davis v. General Finance & Thrift Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Schlesinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.