Lemire v. Haley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
It cannot be said that the Presiding Justice, acting in accordance with the law of the trial, was not warranted in setting the verdict aside as excessive. See Golej v. Varjabedian, 86 N. H. 244, 246, 247. The plaintiff’s exception to the order of the court is accordingly overruled It therefore becomes necessary, for the guidance of the Superior Court in the conduct of the next trial, to consider the final item of the plaintiff’s bill of exceptions. In that item the plaintiff “reserves and relies upon any and all” exceptions taken by her prior to and during the trial.
Subject to the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Golej v. VarjabedianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Muir v. BartlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
- Weeks v. LundSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
- Blake v. LordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Green v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Blanchard v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969