Legal Opinion

Yannuzzi v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1978No. Appeal, No. 654 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This rather unusual case involves a dispute over an unwanted and allegedly lame horse named Free Puff. Free Puff’s owner, Sundance Stables, entered the horse in a “claiming race” on October 28, 1976. The entry of a horse in a claiming race is, in effect, an offer to sell the horse for its “entered prize.” See Rule of Racing 12.01. The “offer” is accepted by making a “claim,” i.e., by completing a claim form and depositing it in the appropriate box 15 minutes prior to the start of the race. Only registered owners of race horses or their licensed agents are authorized to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larkin v. SaffaransDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1883
  2. State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United States ex rel. Pan-Caribe Construction Co. v. Peco International, S.A.District Court, Canal Zone · 1965
  4. Jones v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. Holiday UniversalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. MBB Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (In re Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. B. C. & H. Corp. v. Acme Markets, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1980
  5. Marzullo v. Stop-N-Go Food Stores of Pittsburgh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API