Legal Opinion

Matthew Len Jones v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2017No. S-15-0222; S-16-0201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] Matthew Jones filed the first of these consolidated appeals to challenge his conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a minor. 1 Before submitting a brief in that appeal, he moved the district court for a new trial, claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective. His second appeal contests the denial of that motion. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Jones raises three issues, two of which we combine, and all of which we simplify and restate as follows:

1. Did the district court err in concluding that Jones failed to show that his attorney was ineffective either in pretrial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  4. John Wayne Butler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Kristi Leavitt v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Charles Alfred Armajo v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Bittleston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API