Legal Opinion
Kings Highway Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v. MVAIC
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 14, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed without costs and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant MVAIC moved for summary judgment on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The complaint alleged that the subject claim form was submitted to defendant on or about June 12, 2000. Moreover, both defendant and plaintiff took the position in the lower court that the claim form was submitted and received in June 2000 and that payment became…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Nyack Hospital v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cautious Care Med., P.C. v. MVAICAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. MvaicAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- Clinton Place Med., P.C. v. MVAICAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- Compas Med., P.C. v. MVAICAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- Compas v. MVAICAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.