Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Shane

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1984No. Crim. 84-00083PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

Defendants have moved to dismiss this indictment for abuses of the grand jury process. In the alternative, defendants have moved for release to them of grand jury materials pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)(3)(C)(ii). Defendants allege three sorts of possible abuses of the grand jury process which I consider independently.(1) Improper Transfer of Materials Between Grand Juries

Apparently, three grand juries participated in the investigation of this case. A first grand jury subpoenaed certain documents but expired on August 4, 1982, without having heard…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Charles Estepa and Francis VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. WanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. MalatestaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Nelson CruzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FollinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. United States v. BuntyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. United States v. Loc Tien NguyenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  4. United States v. MoyerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. United States v. Rosendin Electric, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API