Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tommerup v. Albertson's, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1980No. 12621Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

The pivotal issue in this case is the exclusion from evidence of the letters and payments from Albertson’s to the Tommerups. Four days after the accident, Albertson’s wrote Mrs. Tommerup the following: “If you incur any expenses, or have been damaged, as a result of this incident, we will appreciate your forwarding itemized bills for our consideration.” Subsequently, Albertson’s wrote Mrs. Tommerup:

“We do wish to advise that we are willing to accept all of the bills in reference to *9this accident. When you are in a position to finalize the claim, we most certainly will work directly with you…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Potts v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API