Legal Opinion
McIver-Morgan, Inc. v. Piaz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mazzarelli, J.P.
Respondents Christopher Dal Piaz and Elizabeth Schoelkopf (the Owners), engaged petitioner Mclver-Morgan, Inc. (Mclver) to design a major renovation of their townhouse. Promotional materials created by Mclver reflect that it holds itself out as “a full service firm specializing in all facets of high-end residential interior design and architectural services.” It is undisputed that Mclver is a business, not professional, corporation, and that the entity does not have a license to practice architecture. Mclver does, however, employ George Queral, who is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael Francis and Queue, LLC v. Munir Rehman and HAK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Matter of Cavanagh v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Cavanagh v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- McShane v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Mark A. Armenante v. Flying Colours Corp. and FlexJet, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026