Martinez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
EARL W. SMITH, Justice.
Appellant Martinez was convicted of the offense of murder. Trial was to a jury, which assessed punishment at confinement in the Department of Corrections for forty-five years. Appellant’s sole ground of error on appeal is:
[T]he court’s charge is fundamentally defective, under the evidence, because the court failed to charge the jury as to the implied element of murder, i.e., that the State must prove the appellant did not cause the death of Miguel Salazar Guzman under the influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause beyond a reasonable doubt to be entitled…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Luck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Boles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Braudrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Mendivil v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
- Corral v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Knight, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.