Legal Opinion
Sgs-92-X003 v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 26, 2014No. 1:97-cv-00579PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Breach of Implied-in-Fact Contract; Breach of Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Duty to Protect; Confidential Informant; Violation of Procedures; Multiple Sclerosis; Expectation Damages; Causation; Foreseeability; Reasonable Certainty.
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This breaeh-of-contraet action comes before the Court after a trial on damages. In its decision addressing liability, the Court determined that the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) breached an implied-in-fact contract and its duty of good faith and fair dealing by failing to protect Plaintiff, an undercover informant.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Delozier v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015