Sterling v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is Charles Sterling, a former employee of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) who alleges that his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process was abrogated during the course of the termination of his employment. Mr. Sterling and SEPTA have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment, which we resolve today.
BACKGROUND
SEPTA conducts random drug and alcohol testing of selected employees in accordance with the policy set forth in both the 1992-1995 SEPTA/Local 234…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of Philadelphia, Local 234Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nolen v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Diamond State Insurance v. Ranger InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999