Legal Opinion

Naughton v. Kettl

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1943No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The compensation authorities found that claimant was totally disabled by an accident in the course of her employment. The court below affirmed their conclusions, and the case comes here upon the appeal of the employer who contends that the disability is only partial. The only evidence offered was that of claimant and her witnesses; no testimony was offered on behalf of the employer. The question before us is whether there is sufficient competent evidence to sustain the findings of fact.

Claimant is fifty-eight years old; she was employed for fifteen years at $9 per week as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consona v. R. E. Coulborn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Earley v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Conley v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Babcock v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. D'Yantone Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Connolly v. CampbellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Sorby v. Three Rivers MotorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Cohen v. Doubleday & Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API