Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Brady

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1995No. Docket 21322PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This declaratory judgment action was initiated by the respondent/cross-appellant, Continental Casualty Co. (CNA). CNA contends that the insurance policy it issued to the appellant/cross-respondent, Michael Brady et al. (Brady), does not provide coverage for certain third-party claims brought against Brady. For this reason, CNA also contends that it has no duty to defend Brady in the underlying lawsuit.

I

BACKGROUND

On July 1, 1989, Dale and Debbie Duvall hired attorney Golden Bennett to represent them in an action involving the near drowning of their son. Bennett and the Duvalls…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brower v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lindberg v. RosethIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Idaho Transportation Department v. Ascorp, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Freiburger v. J-U-B Engineers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Construction Management Systems, Inc. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API