Legal Opinion
Osiecki v. Town of Huntington
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the one-acre residential zoning classification of the plaintiffs’ property is invalid because it does not comply with a comprehensive plan, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated December 20, 1988, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared the one-acre residential zoning classification valid.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and it is declared that the one-acre residential zoning classification of the plaintiffs’ property is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Udell v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Town of Bedford v. Village of Mount KiscoNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Tilles Investment Co. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tilles Investment Co v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- BLF Associates v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Chiavola v. Village of OakwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- EMB Enterprises, LLC v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Suffolk Interreligious Coalition on Housing, Inc. v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.