Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Ascension Health Long-Term Disability Plan

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided March 31, 2024No. 4:22-cv-00428Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KIMBERLY WILKINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 4:22-cv-00428-SEP ) ASCENSION LONG-TERM DISABILITY, ) PLAN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment, Docs. [40], [43]. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted in part, and Plaintiff’s motion is denied. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff’s claim, but genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on Defendants’ counterclaim. FACTS AND BACKGROUND1…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API