Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Hank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 17, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

The appellants, Mrs. Susan Farrar, Mrs. Perna Dillingham,. and Mrs. Ora Ramage, by separate ,actions, sought to recover of appellee Hank damages for their respective injuries sustained when the automobile in which they were riding, and which was owned and being drived by Mrs. Farrar, struck a bridge abutment and turned over, alleged to have been caused by the negligent and unlawful conduct of appellee in driving his car in the middle of the road and thereby forcing Mrs. Farrar into the ditch and against the abutment.

The answer in each case was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benge's Administrator v. FoutsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Paducah Traction Co. v. Walker's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Reid v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Waller v. Lee CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Graham's Admr. v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herstein v. KemkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  2. Rode v. Adley Express Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Hirsch v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Sheetinger v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API