Legal Opinion
Schering Corp. v. Home Insurance
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1982No. 79 CV 2817PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
This diversity action seeks a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, to construe the coverage of excess liability insurance policies issued to plaintiff drug manufacturer (“Schering”) by defendant insurance company (“Home”). Schering initiated the instant motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(a), F.R.Civ.P., seeking a determination of Home’s contractual obligation to indemnify Schering for certain personal injury claims allegedly arising out of exposure in útero to dienestrol, a synthetic estrogenic substance. 1…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- American Home Products Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.