State on Rel. of Sprinkle v. . Martin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, tried before Mitchell, J., at Spring Term, 1873, of Wilkes Superior Court. Plaintiff declared on the following bond, claiming the same as a guardian bond: " STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, “Wilkes County.
Read the full summary
Civil action, tried before Mitchell, J., at Spring Term, 1873, of Wilkes Superior Court. Plaintiff declared on the following bond, claiming the same as a guardian bond: " STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, “Wilkes County. “ Know all men by these presents, that Benjamin P. Martin, John Martin and N. G. Martin, all of Wilkes county, in the State aforesaid, are held and firmly bound unto the State of North Carolina in the sum of twenty thousand dollar's, current money, to be paid to the said State in trust for the benefit of the child — hereafter named, committed to the tuition of the said S. J. Martin,…
1Opinion of the CourtReade, J.
Benjamin P. Martin was appointed guardian of the feme plaintiff and four of her brothers and sisters, and entered into a bond payable to the State in the sum of §20,000, “ in trust for the benefit of the child hereinafter named, committed to the tuition, of the said S. J. Martin, J. O. Martin, N. E. Martin, E. S. Martin and Felix Martin.” These were the names of the wards, which it seems were inserted in the blank, instead of the name of the guardian, by mistake as we suppose. So that the bond recites that the wards were committed to their own tuition, instead of tor the tuition of the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Battle v. BairdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Embry v. Midland Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915