Legal Opinion
Hara v. Netflix, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2025No. 23-3768Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LANCE HARA, formerly known as No. 23-3768 Vicky Vox, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-03456- Plaintiff - Appellant, RGK-AS v. NETFLIX, INC.; TITMOUSE, INC.; OPINION LOL SEND, INC.; FREMULON, LLC; UNIVERSAL TELEVISION GROUP LLC; HAZY MILLS PRODUCTIONS, INC.; 3 ARTS ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; GABE LIEDMAN; MICHAEL SCHUR; SEAN HAYES; TODD MILLINER; BEN HEINS; DAVID MINER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. Skg Studio, Dba Dreamworks SkgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.