State Highway Commission v. Lee
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentFontron, J.
It is no easy task to dissent from one of Justice Schroeder’s massive, comprehensive and persuasive opinions. Nonetheless I feel compelled to make the effort because of the error which I believe inhered in the trial proceedings and resulted in a trial less than fair to the state.
It is obvious from an examination of the record that the land*308owners, from the time of pretrial conference through final argument, proposed to establish the market value of the condemned land on the basis of a loss to them of some thirty-five prospective lots, twenty of which they valued at $2900 each and the remaining…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. TedescoUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Bonner Springs v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.