Legal Opinion

State v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2017No. MI140050; A159554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J., pro tempore

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for DUII, ORS 813.010(1). She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence that, defendant contends, resulted from the unlawful extension of an otherwise lawful stop by a state trooper. We conclude that the officer had reasonable suspicion to continue the stop to investigate the crime of DUII after the initial basis for the stop dissipated. Accordingly, we affirm.

We review the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress for errors of law, but in doing so we are bound by the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. ZiebartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BlackstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API