Legal Opinion

Pasley v. Barber

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1962No. 128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

The appellant real estate broker’s sales agent was also employed as bookkeeper for appellee’s business and was generally familiar with and advised appellee concerning her business affairs. The principal question to be decided is whether appellant was correctly denied recovery of his real estate commission by the trial court because his salesman knew or should have *550known that appellee was unable to convey clear title to the property listed for sale, it being then involved in divorce litigation.

The facts are that on October 29, 1959, appellee, in writing, listed the A-l…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diamond v. ChiateArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gray v. BlakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sowash v. GarrettAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Strout Realty, Inc. v. MilhousIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Bradley v. WesterfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Pasley v. BarberAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Perkins v. WillacyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API