Legal Opinion

Barkley v. Henke

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1930No. 40115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

The plaintiffs-appellees, Minnie A. Barkley, Julia Wilson, and Rose Henke, by motion asked that the appeal of the appellant, Appanoose County, be dismissed, because notice thereof was not served upon the defendant William Henke. Notice of appeal not having been served upon William Henke, we, for the sake of convenience, refer to him herein as defendant, rather than appellee. Section 12837 of the 1927 Code provides:

“An appeal is taken and perfected by the service of a notice in writing on the adverse party, his agent, or any attorney who appeared for him in the case in the court below, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Will of Downs v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Brewer v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. McCoid v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coggon State Bank v. WoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. In Re Estate of ShumakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Herrold v. HerroldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Shafer v. Henry County Soldiers & Sailors Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API