Legal Opinion
Teliax, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 1, 2016No. Civil Action No 15-cv-01472-RBJPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for a summary judgment dismissing defendant’s counterclaim. ECF No. 59. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS that motion.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff Teliax, Inc. is a company that routs toll-free 1-800 or “8YY” calls in Colorado. Defendant AT & T Corp. services many of those 8YY customers. Teliax alleges that AT & T has failed to fully pay *1096its bills for Teliax’s routing services.1 See ECF No. 44 (Second Amended Complaint). AT & T counters that Teliax charges a rate applicable to “end office”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Ton Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.