Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Beasley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1945No. 3549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It is unnecessary to decide how far the general rule relating to the acquisition of a domicile by a soldier on military duty would here be followed. With reference to that rule, see Restatement, Conf. of Laws, s. 21, comment c; Anno. 129 A. L. R. 1387, 1388; 28 C. J. S. 28, note 12; West v. West, 35 Haw. 461, and cases cited.

A domicile is “the place in which, both in fact and intent, the home of a person is established” (Foss v. Foss, 58 N. H. 283, 284), and “whether or not a new domicile has been acquired is primarily a question of fact under all the circumstances of the particular case”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. West v. WestHawaii Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ballou v. BallouSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  2. Volmer v. VolmerOregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API