Legal Opinion
Coniff v. Hunnicutt
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 15, 1924No. 3864PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The instruction of the court to the jury, to which the plaintiffs except in the first ground of their amendment to their motion for new trial, states a correct abstract principle of law. The registry of a deed, not attested, proved, or acknowledged according to law, is not constructive notice to a subsequent bona fide purchaser. Herndon v. Kimball, 7 Ga. 432 (50 Am. D. 406); Gardner v. Granniss, 57 Ga. 539, 557; Williams v. Smith, 128 Ga. 306, 314 (57 S. E. 801); Donalson v. Thomason, 137 Ga. 848 (3) (74 S. E. 762); Civil Code (1910), § 3320. We think this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Gardner v. GrannissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Wadley Lumber Co. v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Conant v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Donalson v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hopkins v. Virginia Highland Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Higdon v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Hansen v. LindellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Spencer v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Blue Ridge Apartment Co. v. Telfair Stockton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.