Legal Opinion
Federal Financial Co. v. Noe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 12, 1998No. 98-381PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Federal Financial Company (“FFC”) appeals the order of the Craighead County Circuit Court which dismissed the FFC’s cause of action against Wendell H. and Elizabeth Noe because it was time barred. In so holding, the trial court rejected the FFC’s argument that the six-year statute of limitations provided in 12 U.S.C.A. § 1821(d)(14)(A)(i) was applicable. Instead, the trial court barred the FFC’s action under Arkansas’s five-year statute of limitations as set out in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-56-111 (Supp. 1997).
When the FFC tendered its direct brief in this appeal, and requested…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Porter v. HarshfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Union Recovery Ltd. Partnership v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Greene County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Bonds v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Hurst v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Greene County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Bonds v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002