Legal Opinion

People v. Chaitin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1984PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The argument, first advanced in our court, that under the language of the indictment and the instructions of the trial court the jury was required to find that the actual filing of the false invoices occurred in Kings County but that there is no evidence in the record to support any such finding, was not preserved for our review, there having been no motion to dismiss in the trial court based on this ground (cf. People v Coria, 49 NY2d 26, 33, n 2).

Nor did the trial court commit error in permitting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. New York v. Sokol (In Re Sokol)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. People v. BottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. PattersonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
  5. People v. PonnapulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API