Brainard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOTT, District Judge.
Two questions are raised by, or are incidental to, defendant’s motion to dismiss: (1) Is there extant an adjudication, binding upon this court, as plaintiff contends, that he was engaged in interstate commerce at the time of his injury and hence may prosecute the instant suit to recover damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act ?1 (2) If not, do the stipulated facts show that plaintiff was not engaged in interstate commerce at the time of his injury and therefore this court is without jurisdiction, both plaintiff and defendant being citizens and residents of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
- Gileo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955