In re Wayne R. Rohde
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceMcLeese, Associate Judge
I agree with the court that we should adopt both (1) the conclusion of the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) that Mr. Rohde's conviction for leaving the scene of an accident did not involve moral turpitude and (2) the Board's recommended sanction. I write separately because I do not agree with the court's analysis of the question whether Mr. Rohde's conviction involved moral turpitude on the facts. Ante at 1131-35. Although our cases use somewhat varying language to describe the nature of the inquiry into whether a conviction involved moral turpitude on the facts, I have no quarrel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.