Legal Opinion

Nohe v. Roblyn Development Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 2, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COBURN, J.S.C. (Temporarily Assigned).

This is an action on a contract for the sale of residential property between a corporate developer and consumers. The contract included a liquidated damages clause which, if enforceable, would permit the seller to retain a deposit of $79,027.40. The matter was decided below in favor of plaintiffs on a motion for *174summary judgment. The Wilson defendants had guaranteed the corporate obligation respecting return of the deposit. Defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs, asking us, as they did the court below, to assume that they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Naporano Associates, L.P. v. B & P BuildersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Balsamides v. PerleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Days Inns of America, Inc. v. Regency Manor, Ltd.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  4. Vanderbeek v. BarefootCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Vanderbeek v. BarefootCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API