Legal Opinion

Matthews v. New Century Mortgage Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 8, 2002No. 2:00-cv-01332PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CHATIGNY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Based on the following analysis, the Court GRANTS the Defendant’s Motion in part and DENIES the Defendant’s Motion in part.

II. FACTS

A. Ruth Morgan

Plaintiff Ruth Morgan, 1 then an 87-year-old single woman, was contacted in October 1997 by an employee of Century 21 Home Improvement and Incredible Exteriors, Inc. (“Century 21”). The Century 21 employee told Ms. Morgan that the siding…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. M & T Mortgage Corp. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Raymond Lee, Jr. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Beer v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API