Legal Opinion

Bulger v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 2003No. 1-01-0871PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MARA FROSSARD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Daniel Bulger sued defendants, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Tony E. Williams, for personal injuries plaintiff incurred when he was struck by a CTA bus driven by Williams. Bulger’s wife, plaintiff Rodiea Lung, sued for loss of consortium. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor. However, the jury found Bulger 50% contributorily negligent and reduced the damages award accordingly.

On appeal, defendants seek a new trial on the issue of liability, contending that the trial court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bright v. DickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bakes v. St. Alexius Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Davis v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. Lisowski v. MacNeal Memorial Hospital AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Solis v. BASF Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Lisowski v. MACNEAL MEMORIAL HOSP. ASS'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API