Legal Opinion
Chemical Bank v. Richmul Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1987No. 87 Civ. 1637 (MP)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Chemical Bank has applied for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses, for its filing and maintaining of an inter-pleader action. The fund in controversy has been distributed by stipulation entered into by the defendants in this action, subject to a reservation of Chemical’s right to claim its attorneys’ fees and expenses.
BACKGROUND
Chemical Bank was a creditor of William M. Mulderig and several entities he controlled (“the debtors”). According to Chemical, as of February 1987, it had outstanding loans to the debtors of $16,107,-528,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A/s Krediit Pank v. The Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. DoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Paul Revere Life Insurance Company v. RiddleDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
- Sparta Florida Music Group, Ltd. v. Chrysalis Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pressman v. Estate of SteinvorthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. v. ConnollyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Correspondent Services Corp. v. J.V.W. Investments Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Pressman v. Estate of SteinvorthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.