Legal Opinion

Fairbanks v. Bennett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. (Pealer, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The action in this case is trespass for wrongfully taking and carrying away a quantity of goods claimed to be the property of the plaintiff, and for injuries consequent thereon. Plea, general issue, with notice that the goods were taken by defendant as an officer under attachment against the property of Charles N. Fairbanks, husband of plaintiff.

On the twenty-fourth day of February, 1883, suit was commenced before a justice of the peace by George ~W. Dubois & Co., by writ of attachment against Charles N. Fairbanks, for $250. The defendant was constable, and by virtue of the writ seized the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Millar v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Roelofson v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Buckley v. LowryMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  4. School District No. 3 v. MacloonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Adams v. AbramMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Ames v. ParrottNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bryant v. DuffySupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API