Legal Opinion

Angelena Dentis Baize v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided March 9, 2022No. 12-22-00030-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NO. 12-22-00030-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ANGELENA DENTIS BAIZE, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Angelena Dentis Baize, acting pro se, filed a petition for permissive appeal. We deny the petition. STANDARD OF REVIEW Unless a statute specifically authorizes an interlocutory appeal, appellate courts have jurisdiction only over final judgments. Cherokee Water Co. v. Ross,

698 S.W.2d 363, 365

(Tex. 1985). Section 51.014 of the Texas Civil Practice and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. CMH HOMES v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Cherokee Water Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association v. Randy JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API