Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Crowder Investments, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided November 18, 1992No. 10-92-064-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

Charles and Faye Stephens are appealing from a summary judgment in favor of Crowder Investments, Inc., a company that operates funeral homes. The Stephenses have four points of error. In their first point, they argue that the court erred in granting the summary judgment. Second, the Stephenses assert, the trial court erred in holding that, as a matter of law, the company was not negligent and owed them no legal duty. Their third point of error is that the court denied them due process under the United States Constitution and the Texas Constitution by granting the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McClure v. Allied Stores of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amaya v. Potter, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002
  2. Finley v. U-HAUL CO. OF ARIZONA, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Allene Finley, Administratrix of the Estate of John Finley v. U-Haul Co. of Arizona and U-Haul Co. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  4. Hartsfield v. McRee Ford, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Hartsfield v. McRee Ford, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API