Legal Opinion

Moss v. Katz & Mayer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1887No. 2364PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Ellis. Tried below before the Hon, Anson Rainey.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by Katz & Mayer against A. Moss, upon certain open accounts for goods sold and delivered.

A writ of attachment was prayed for and issued, but no<prayer for foreclosure of the attachment lien is found in the petition. The defendant pleaded, among other things, that a large portion of the debt sued for was not due. When the case was called for trial, the defendant’s counsel applied for a postponement of the trial because of the absence of his client, whose attendance he could procure in a few hours, and by whom he expected to prove that a part of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conrad v. JudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Rentfrow v. Lancaster & TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Oscar v. SackvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Rosser v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. McFarland v. Savannah River Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API