Hartman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREEN, Commissioner.
This appeal is from a conviction in a trial before a jury of rape. The punishment was assessed at life.
Appellant was represented in the trial court and is represented on appeal by court-appointed counsel. A brief has been filed by appellant’s attorney wherein he states that after a diligent, thorough and conscientious study of the record, he is of the opinion that “this appeal is without merit in law.” The record reflects that appellant personally acknowledged receipt of a copy of his attorney’s brief. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Clanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.