Legal Opinion

Hartman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1973No. 46458PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREEN, Commissioner.

This appeal is from a conviction in a trial before a jury of rape. The punishment was assessed at life.

Appellant was represented in the trial court and is represented on appeal by court-appointed counsel. A brief has been filed by appellant’s attorney wherein he states that after a diligent, thorough and conscientious study of the record, he is of the opinion that “this appeal is without merit in law.” The record reflects that appellant personally acknowledged receipt of a copy of his attorney’s brief. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Clanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API