Legal Opinion

Campos v. Helmhold

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 3, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01806Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 NATHAN CAMPOS and JANET GARVEY Case No. C22-1806-RSM 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ 10 MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, DISMISS, AND 11 v. STAY DISCOVERY BIG FISH GAMES, INC., a Washington 12 corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Big Fish Games, Inc. and Product 17 Madness, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”)’ “Motion to Compel Arbitration or, in the Alternative, 18 to Dismiss.” Dkt. #96. Plaintiffs Nathan Campos and Janet Garvey…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API